now is all too clear that in the case of a referendum, the bridge would be rejected by a Citadel percentage of Bulgarian citizens. More or less the same percentage who condemned the chimney and Borsalino in 1984, with the smokestack, gangway Teresio Corso Borsalino. Not to mention the structure of the factory as such, only to regret a few years later, just long enough to realize the crap job.
Leaving aside for love of country the justification for cutting down the real monuments of industrial architecture, when a city like Turin has instead managed to transform the Lingotto factory in a box social, cultural and, perhaps, commercial . It would be Just copy, but it seems that here too we have not been able to emerge. A partial excuse us but we must say that while in Turin, had the lawyer, in Alexandria, we had no more nor nor Usuelli Borsalino, the latter died in 1983.
goes back exactly a year after the disappearance of Usuelli the deployment of demolition of much of our historical monuments, but already in 1969 the picks they appropriated the old Virginia Marine Theatre, on whose ruins was then built the current Theatre.
Now is the time of the old Citadel Bridge, survived the 1994 and scrap all'esondazione Twin Gardens of the bridge, the Forlanini, demolished and replaced by a structure next to quell'alluvione very ugly, when you could clean up the tons of debris that obstruct many of the arches.
All this to satisfy a demand for virtual security, but we must tell those who come after us, Alexandria is a city always uncertain and subject to flooding more or less serious, if you do not realize the work of protection provided upstream the city, and always postponed.
works ever produced by arguing that no person with a little common sense can never accept. You can not tell six thousand people (many would be the only residents on the banks of the river in Alexandria), who will go to soak from time to time, including assets and perhaps with a few victims (we have already buried 12 in the past) because we do not have the money for the construction works to safeguard.
works which clearly involve greater interest from an economic standpoint.
It therefore prefers to play on the skin of the citizens would endanger the safety and property because the Entities (AIPO, Region, Province and Municipality of Alba, Asti and Alessandria, in addition to the Superintendent of monumental assets) are not able to find
the necessary funds? Those responsible should be put that into your head that we can never accept the theory of "too expensive" when there is, at national, regional, provincial and municipal levels to a real waste of public resources.
In short, if we do not have the money must be found today. It must be found because "it costs too much", he has no reason to exist, especially when we then see, in this country and also in our country, in fact absolutely scandalous squandering of public money.
Ps: For article already written, comes a new fact, namely the intervention of the mayor of Alexandria Piercarlo Fabbio, Saturday, May 2, at the hall Ferrero, addressed to the Minister Gianfranco Rotondi. Carry some passages in my opinion fundamental "hydrogeological and environmental safety in our country, is not being properly maintained and designed from the perspective of his human presence. In the end, this state of affairs persists, there is much more expensive in terms of an emergency. "
And again "I wish it were considered a request that many mayors will make, namely that the money intended for the routine maintenance of nature that are always available to man is near." But Fabbio calls to ensure that not only the money available for emergencies, "because that costs us a lot more damage in terms of social, psychological, safety or uncertainty regarding our people. "
An intervention to Fabbio that could be read as a request to the government to take action, and allocate the funding needed for the effective securing of the city because the emergency can not be a made permanent?
We hope so.
0 comments:
Post a Comment